Keywords: chronic disease, health insurance, socioeconomic status, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, health promotion, public health services
Home
healthcare
Public Health Care In The United States A Healthy Debate
chronic diseases, health insurance, socio-economic status, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, health promotion, public healthcare Public health care i
Lyrics Porun: KA
Lyrics Porun: KA
Thursday, 30 June 2022
FacebookTwitter
Public health care in the United States a healthy debate
His remarks suggest a discussion of the pros and cons of universal health care in the United States. Disadvantages of public health care include significant advance costs and logistical challenges. On the other hand, universal healthcare can lead to a healthierpopulation and thus, in the long run, help reduce the economic costs of an unhealthy nation. In particular, significant health inequalities exist in the United States, with lower socioeconomic status segments of the population reducing access to quality health care and increasing the risk. Although the implementation of universal healthcare will be complex and challenging, we argue that there is a need to shift from a market-based system to a universal healthcare system. Universal Health Care will better facilitate and encourage sustainable, preventive health practices and be more beneficial to the long-term public health and economy of the United States.
Keywords: chronic diseases, health insurance, socio-economic status, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, health promotion, public healthcare
Public health care in the United States a healthy debate
More Post Visit : We are going to discuss some brief issues of healthcare
1. Introduction
Healthcare is one of the most important socio-political issues in the United States, and citizens currently rank "healthcare" as the most important issue when it comes to voting. The United States has historically used a mixed public / private approach to healthcare. In this way, citizens or businesses can obtain health insurance from private (e.g., Blue Cross Blue Shield, Kaiser Permanent) insurance companies, while individuals can also qualify for the public (e.g., Medicaid, Medicare, Veterans Affairs), government-subsidized health Insurance. In contrast, the vast majority of post-industrial, Western countries have used a variety of methods to provide full or largely government subsidized, universal health care to all citizens, regardless of socio-economic status (SES), employment status, or ability to pay. The World Health Organization defines public health care as "ensuring that all people have access to essential health services (including prevention, promotion, treatment, rehabilitation and relief) to be effective and also to ensure that the use of these services is not disclosed. 2]. Importantly, the passage of the Obama-era Affordable Care Act (ACA) sought to bring the United States closer to universal health care by expanding health coverage for millions of Americans (e.g., through the expansion of Medicaid, launching a health insurance marketplace for personal coverage), including income levels. Citizens across age, race and ethnicity.
Different versions of universal healthcare are possible. The United Kingdom's national health services can be considered as a fairly traditional version of universal healthcare for which there are several options, and minimal use of personalized care [3]. On the other hand, European countries such as Switzerland, the Netherlands and Germany have used a mixed system with sufficient government and market-based elements.
Germany, for example, uses a multi-pair healthcare system where subsidized healthcare is widely available for low-income citizens, yet individual options which provide the same quality and level of care as subsidized options are also available to high-income individuals.
Thus, public health care does not necessarily preclude the role of individual providers in the healthcare system, but rather ensures the equality and effectiveness of care at the population and individual levels as a reference and expectation for the system as a whole.
In line with this, versions of universal health care have been applied by countries with different political backgrounds (e.g., not traditionally confined to "socialist / liberal" countries), some with higher degrees of economic independence [6,7].
Determining which country’s healthcare is “universal” is complex and is not a “black and white” issue. For example, government support, the will of the people and the basic funding structure, among many other factors, must be widely considered.
Although an in-depth analysis of each of these factors is beyond the scope of this commentary, there are clear advantages and disadvantages to policies that are purely private, market-based, and public, as well as public approaches to public health care. , Will then follow the authors' position and closing comments on the subject.
Go to:
2. Argument against UniversalHealth Care
Although most post-industrialized Westernized countries employ a universal healthcare model, few of these countries if any are geographically large, populous, or ethnically diverse regions of the United States defined by distinct cultural identities, citizens with unique religious and political identities.
There are values and people are spread across the socio-economic spectrum. In addition, heterogeneous climates and population densities present different health needs and challenges across the United States.
Thus, critics of universal health care in the United States argue that implementation will not be as-organizationally or financially as in other developed countries [9]. In fact, there is an agreement that the implementation of universal healthcare in the United States will require significant advance costs.
These costs will include related issues: (i) physical and technical infrastructural changes in the healthcare system, at the government level (e.g., federal, state, local) as well as at the provider level (e.g., hospital, out-patient clinic, pharmacy, etc.);
(ii) insuring / treating a significant, previously uninsured, and largely unhealthy part of the population; And (iii) expansion of the range of services provided (e.g., dentistry, sight, hearing) [10].
The cost of a universalhealthcare system will depend on its structure, the level of benefits and the amount of coverage. However, most proposals will require increased federal taxes, at least for high-income earners.
0 Comments